Civil Rights Cases
Wilson et al v. Rack Seven Paving Co. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00163
Defendant: Rack Seven Paving Co., Timothy Rack and Kevin Rack
Plaintiff: Daniel Wilson, Mark Hammock, Robert Duffy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2018cv01391
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
McIntosh v. City of New York
as 17-617
Plaintiff - Appellant: Iman McIntosh
Defendant - Appellee: City of New York, Police Officer Harold Taylor, Sergeant Hong Chen and others
Defendant: Kristopher Vecchio and John/Jane Does, 1-20
McIntosh v. The City of New York et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00051
Defendant: John/Jane Does 1-20, Police Officer Harold Taylor, The City of New York and others
Plaintiff: Iman McIntosh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams et al v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2013cv00018
Petitioner: Anthony Troy Williams
Respondent: State of Tennessee, Bill Haslam, Karl Dean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv01628
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Taylor v. State of California Department of Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv00024
Plaintiff: Harold Taylor and Harold Taylor
Defendant: State of California Department of Corrections, Benjamin Lee and Preetranjan Sahota
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Taylor v. State of California, Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2009at00004
Plaintiff: Harold Taylor
Defendant: State of California, Department of Corrections, Benjamin Lee and Preetranjan Sahota
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?