Cases 1 - 10 of 131
Cantu v. Moore
as 1:2023cv01476
Plaintiff:
Marco A. Cantu and Marco Alberto Cantu
Defendant:
J. Michael Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
The State of Georgia v. Mark Meadows
as 23-12958
Plaintiff / Appellee:
THE STATE OF GEORGIA
Defendant / Appellant:
MARK RANDALL MEADOWS
Amicus Curiae:
ERWIN CHEMERINSKY, AMY LEE COPELAND, SARAH R. SALDANA and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE, DONALD B. AYER, JOHN J. FARMER, JR. and others
ALIOTA v. MILLCREEK TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT
as 1:2023cv00188
Plaintiff:
LOUIS J. ALIOTA
Defendant:
MILLCREEK TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT, MEREDITH BOLLHEIMER, CHRISTOPHER BUSKO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Justin Laster v. City of Americus, Georgia, et al
as 23-11092
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUSTIN LASTER
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF AMERICUS, GEORGIA, ALFONSON ROSS, J MICHAEL GREENE and others
Garrison v. Guerrant et al
as 1:2023cv01378
Plaintiff:
Carneeda Garrison
Defendant:
Judge Elizabeth Ann Guerrant, Whitney Harper and J. Michael Williams
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Henao et al v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2022cv00352
Plaintiff:
Joseph Henao, Angela Henao and J. Michael Hopper
Defendant:
County of Sacramento, Jennifer Rodriguez, Seleena Ulahannan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv08882
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
J. Ruttle v. Sandi Brady, et al
as 22-3000
Plaintiff / Appellant:
J. MICHAEL RUTTLE
Defendant / Appellee:
SANDI BRADY, RYAN BERRY, DAVID BRIA and others
Wynn v. Cassara et al
as 6:2022cv06353
Counter Defendant:
James I. Wynn, Sr.
Defendant:
Gerda B. Cassara, Housing Advocacy Service Inc., A Bay Abstract and others
Counter Claimant:
Mark Greisderger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
