Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Bynum v. Everett et al
as 3:2021cv00921
Defendant:
San Diego Mesa College and James Everett
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bynum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv
JACOVETTI LAW P.C. et al v. SHELTON et al
as 2:2020cv00163
Defendant:
JAMES EVERETT SHELTON, DAN BOGER and FINAL VERDICT SOLUTIONS
Plaintiff:
EMIL YASHAYEV, BARRY SHARGEL, ROBERT C. JACOVETTI and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Ferrell v. Sparkman et al
as 4:2019cv00067
Defendant:
William M Locke, TENNESSEE HIGHWAY PATROL ADMINISTRATION, JAMIE GIBSON and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES EVERETT FERRELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FERRELL v. SPARKMAN et al
as 3:2019cv00840
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, TENNESSEE HIGHWAY PATROL ADMINISTRATION, JAMIE GIBSON and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES EVERETT FERRELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FERRELL v. SPARKMAN et al
as 1:2019cv02269
Defendant:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, TENNESSEE HIGHWAY PATROL ADMINISTRATION, JAMIE GIBSON and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES EVERETT FERRELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv02146
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miles v. General Motors
as 1:2018cv03589
Plaintiff:
James Everett Miles
Defendant:
General Motors
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Velasquez v. Woodhill Public Facility Corp, et al
as 5:2017cv00178
Defendant:
James Everett Norwood and Woodhill Public Facility Corp
Plaintiff:
Oswald Emmanuel Velasquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
McCarty v. Allen County et al
as 3:2011cv02585
Plaintiff:
Lindi McCarty
Defendant:
Allen County, Ohio, Samuel Crish, James Everett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
