Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03761
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Johnson v. City of New York
as 1:2016cv06426
Plaintiff:
Johnson and Michael Johnson
Defendant:
City of New York, Daniel A. Nigro, Michael Gala and others
Not Classified By Court:
Hon. Joseph Kevin McKay
Interested Party:
Susan Edelman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lane v. McCarthy et al
as 1:2022cv11145
Plaintiff:
Luanita Lane
Defendant:
James McCarthy, Frantz Dumond and Nicholas Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03898
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01016
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Johnson v. Mannix et al
as 1:2018cv02842
Defendant:
James McCarthy, John and Jane Does, Paul Mannix and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
FEACHER v. NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2011cv04544
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY FEACHER
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE AUTHORITY , JAMES MCCARTHY, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-309
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
McCarthy v. Town of Windermere
as 6:2011cv00014
Plaintiff:
James McCarthy, Jr.
Defendant:
Town of Windermere
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
