Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Nuno Trevino v. City of Austin
as 23-50118
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rosalinda Nuno Trevino
Defendant / Appellee:
City of Austin and John-Matthew Hattaway
Haney v. Miller et al
as 1:2022cv02954
Plaintiff:
James Thomas Haney
Defendant:
John Matthew Miller, Kimberly Miller, Jane Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Chancey et al v. Illinois State Board of Elections et al
as 1:2022cv04043
Plaintiff:
John Matthew Chancey, Restoration PAC and Fair Courts America
Defendant:
Illinois State Board of Elections, Ian Linnabary, Casandra B. Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lilley, Jeffrey v. Matthews, John et al
as 3:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lilley
Defendant:
Wood County, John Matthews, Derek Phillippi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00611
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MATTHEWS et al v. GRESHAM et al
as 3:2021cv00863
Plaintiff:
Derrick D Matthews and Glen E Arne
Defendant:
Justin S Fountain, Brenda L Matthews, Kenneth A Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nuno-Trevino v. City of Austin et al
as 1:2021cv00187
Defendant:
Matthew Hattaway, City of Austin and John-Matthew Hattaway
Plaintiff:
Linda Nuno-Trevino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Strauss v. Kentucky Board Medical Licensure (KBML)
as 6:2020cv06835
Defendant:
Kentucky Board Medical Licensure (KBML)
Plaintiff:
John Matthew Strauss, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
MATTHEWS v. HILLEGASS et al
as 1:2018cv02235
Plaintiff:
STANLEY JOHN MATTHEWS
Defendant:
REBECCA WATSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
