Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Ellis Jr. v. Sandoval et al
as 1:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Guy Ellis Jr.
Defendant:
Angela Sandoval, John Tekin, Dea Zantow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LENTZ v. MURPHY 3RD
as 3:2023cv22489
Plaintiff:
TREY LENTZ
Defendant:
ESQ. JOHN MURPHY 3RD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Jacobs v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2023cv10530
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Jacobs
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Rick Snyder, Gretchen Whitmer and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv11517
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rose Karam v. University of Arizona, et al
as 22-15332
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROSE ANN KARAM
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA, SOUTHERN ARIZONA VETERANS ADMINISTRATION HEALTH CARE SYSTEM, UNITED STATES AIR FORCE, Davis Monthan Air Force Base and others
Defendant:
DAVID LAMB, AMY KENNEDY, SHANNA O'CONNOR and others
Wynn v. City of Covington et al
as 2:2021cv00137
Plaintiff:
Anthony Mario Wynn
Defendant:
City of Covington, Douglas Ullrich, John Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Doe et al v. The NYS Office of Children and Family Services et al
as 1:2020cv01195
Defendant:
"John" Smith, The NYS Office of Children and Family Services, Taberg Residential Center for Girls and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe and Jane Roe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
