Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Marner et al v. U.S. Department of the Air Force et al
as 3:2024cv00502
Plaintiff:
Zachary Marner, Nevaeh Marner, Robert Shelder, Jr. and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of the Air Force, Tom Ryan, Brittany Bates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
POMASKI v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION et al
as 3:2023cv10764
Plaintiff:
JASON POMASKI
Defendant:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION, MICHAEL INDENBOM, CHADD TATE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00977
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00597
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Dunn et al v. Barry et al
as 1:2018cv10581
Plaintiff:
Anne Dunn and Anthony Dunn
Defendant:
Patrick Barry and John Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2018cv00038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04404
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Unable To Remember Name At This Time:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Robert Martinez v. L. Donaldson, et al
as 10-17200
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT MARTINEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
L. DONALDSON, CDCR Legal Analysis Processing Unit, in his Official and Individual capacities, JAMES TILTON, In his official and individual capacities, ELLIOTT POWE, CDCR Parole Agent, in his official and individual capacities and others
Martinez v. Donaldson et al
as 2:2009cv03046
Plaintiff:
Robert Martinez
Defendant:
L. Donaldson, James Tilton, Elliott Powe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
