Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00617
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Selestan-Bey v. Person-Garner et al
as 1:2023cv01975
Plaintiff:
Kayla Keona Selestan-Bey, Kayla Keona Selestan, Evelyn Denise Barrett-Bey and others
Defendant:
Tiana Jean Person-Garner, William Franklin Brogdon, Gene F. Cantrell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Boyde v. Barnes
as 5:2022cv01024
Plaintiff:
Johnny William Boyde
Defendant:
Detective Andrew Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boyde v. Fahey
as 22-1367
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Johnny William Boyde, AKA Johnny W. Boyde
Defendant / Appellee:
Joseph E. Fahey
Coleman v. City of New Roads et al
as 3:2022cv00377
Plaintiff:
Monica Coleman
Defendant:
City of New Roads, Cornell Dukes, Kevin McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Boyde v. Fahey
as 5:2021cv01277
Plaintiff:
Johnny William Boyde and Johnny W. Boyde
Defendant:
Joseph E. Fahey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis et al v. Forrest County, Mississippi et al
as 2:2021cv00050
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Ann Dear, Johnny William Davis, Kattie Cabra Bernaird and others
Defendant:
XYZ Corporations 1-5, John Does 1-5 and Forrest County, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyde v. City of Syracuse
as 5:2021cv00270
Defendant:
City of Syracuse
Plaintiff:
Johnny William Boyde
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boyde v. County of Onondaga et al
as 5:2019cv00150
Defendant:
City of Syracuse and County of Onondaga
Plaintiff:
Johnny William Boyde
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv02772
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
