Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Tineo v. Virgin Islands Department of Justice - Paternity and Child Support Division et al
as 3:2026cv00039
Plaintiff:
Areliz Tineo
Defendant:
Virgin Islands Department of Justice - Paternity and Child Support Division, Alaine Lockhart Mollah, Judy Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hill v. Tiempo Development, et al.
as 26-4531
Plaintiff:
KECIA HILL, individually as surviving mother and statutory wrong death beneficiary on behalf of Jaquai Robert Williams, personal representative of Estate of Jaquai Robert williams
Defendant:
TIEMPO DEVELOPMENT, a domestic Arizona entity, CPIC, as parent company, GRANDES CORTES APARTMENTS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-4448
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Drouin v. City of Franklin, New Hampshire et al
as 1:2026cv00535
Plaintiff:
Jacob Drouin
Defendant:
Franklin, NH, City of, Franklin Police Department, David Goldstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01189
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv01569
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Hill v. Tiempo Development & Management et al
as 2:2026cv04202
Plaintiff:
Kecia Hill
Defendant:
Tiempo Development & Management, CPIC, Grand Cortez Apartments and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
v. MCCLELLAAN et al
as 1:2026cv00080
Defendant:
JUDY L MCCLELLAAN and TAYLOR LEE CARR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-2146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01948
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
