Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Karen Wells, et al v. Mark Hanneman, et al
as 24-2612
Plaintiff:
Andre Locke, as co-trustees for the next of kin of Amir Rahkare Locke, deceased and Karen Wells, as co-trustees for the next of kin of Amir Rahkare Locke, deceased
Defendant:
City of Minneapolis and Mark Hanneman, in his individual capacity as a Minneapolis police officer
Wells et al v. Hanneman et al
as 0:2023cv00273
Plaintiff:
Karen Wells and Andre Locke
Defendant:
Mark Hanneman and City of Minneapolis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Fucich v. Roby et al
as 1:2020cv00376
Plaintiff:
Clayton J. Fucich
Defendant:
David C. Jarrell, Jerry E. Smith, Andrew S. Oldham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00053
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Caesars Mass. Development, et al v. Crosby, et al
as 14-1681
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CAESARS MASSACHUSETTS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC, CAESARS MASSACHUSETTS MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC, CAESARS MASSACHUSETTS INVESTMENT COMPANY, LLC and others
Defendant - Appellee:
STEPHEN P. CROSBY, in his personal capacity and in his official capacity as Chairman of the Massachusetts Gaming Commission and KAREN WELLS, in her personal capacity and in her official capacity as Director of the Investigations and Enforcement Bureau of the Massachusetts Gaming Commission
Caesars Massachusetts Development Company, LLC et al v. Crosby
as 1:2013cv13144
Plaintiff:
Caesars Massachusetts Development Company, LLC , Caesars Massachusetts Management Company, LLC and Caesars Massachusetts Investment Company, LLC
Defendant:
Stephen P. Crosby and Karen Wells
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-5006
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-14611
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Dantzler v. Africk et al
as 2:2009cv03703
Plaintiff:
Oscar Dantzler
Defendant:
Lance M Africk, Mary Ann Vial Lemmon, Karen Wells Roby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
