Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv01870
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01528
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Wiley v. Town of Danvers et al
as 1:2026cv13217
Plaintiff:
Shawn R. Wiley
Defendant:
Town of Danvers, James P. Lovell, Stephanie Wennerberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 American With Disabilities Act- Discrimination
Ternus v. Hilgers et al
as 4:2026cv03190
Plaintiff:
Kate Ternus
Defendant:
Michael Hilgers and Ashley Newmyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Guillory v. Doe et al
as 4:2026cv04064
Plaintiff:
Patrick Guillory
Defendant:
Kate Doe, Claudia Doe and Domino's Pizza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv08113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Clervrain v. Griffin, et al
as 26-1534
Plaintiff:
MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN, ASHLY CARMELLE DORSAINVILLE, FRIDELYNE MAISONEUVE and others
Defendant:
ANTWAUN GRIFFIN, ISABELLA CASILLAS GUZMAN, DIEDRA HENRY-SPIRES and others
Drakewyck v. Aurora Public Schools et al
as 1:2026cv02007
Plaintiff:
Kate Drakewyck, Kate Drakewyck Wolf and Kate Wolf
Defendant:
Aurora Public Schools, Melinda Davis and Haleh Torbaghan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
