Cases 1 - 10 of 45
KELTON v. LICATA et al
as 3:2024cv06506
Plaintiff:
ROBERT KELTON
Defendant:
OFFICER JOSEPH LICATA and JOHN AND/OR JANE DOES NOS. 1, 2, 3, ETC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Kelton Spann v. Bogalusa Clerk of Court
as 23-30820
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kelton L. Spann
Defendant / Appellee:
Bogalusa Clerk of Court Office, Tonia Deleon and Tonia Deleon, Deputy Clerk
SORENSON v. UTAH DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 1:2023cv03259
Plaintiff:
KELTON JONATHON SORENSON
Defendant:
UTAH DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Smith v. Tapley et al
as 4:2023cv00748
Plaintiff:
Kelton Smith
Defendant:
William Tapley, Lisa Mabry-Williams and Conway, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Ivey v. HPA USI LLC
as 1:2023cv02094
Plaintiff:
Kelton Geovani Ivey
Defendant:
HPA USI LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
McEwen v. Conder et al
as 4:2023cv00207
Plaintiff:
Dezanae McEwen
Defendant:
Tiffany Conder, Kelton Smith, Samuel Fitzgerald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Spann v. Bogalusa City Police Department et al
as 2:2021cv02292
Plaintiff:
Kelton L. Spann
Defendant:
Bogalusa City Police Department and David Miller
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Spann v. Bogalusa Clerk of Court Office et al
as 2:2021cv00519
Plaintiff:
Kelton L. Spann
Defendant:
Bogalusa Clerk of Court Office and Tonia Deleon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelton v. Prentiss County, Mississippi
as 1:2020cv00213
Defendant:
Prentiss County, Mississippi
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Kelton, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
