Cases 1 - 10 of 33,557
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01543
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00565
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv08513
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 IDEA: Challenge decision re education for handicapped
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00462
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Rochelle Maly, et al v. J.B. Pritzker, et al
as 24-3024
Defendant:
CASANDRA B. WATSON, JACK VRETT, CATHERINE S. MCCRORY and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES R. STIRN, ROCHELLE M. MALY and JENEANE L. FERGUSON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00174
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans With Disabilities Act, et seq
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Oliver [E-filer] v. M.A.O. et al
as 2:2024cv12962
Defendant:
Stephanie Pyrros-Hensen, Elizabeth L. Gleicher, Ryan E. Christiansen and others
Plaintiff:
Shari L. Oliver [E-filer], M.A.O. and M.L.O.
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Stinson Sr. v. Fowlkes et al
as 1:2024cv24354
Defendant:
Wall & Associates, Inc., Larry C. Miller, DBA MR. COOPER NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLCS and others
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11468
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
