Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Corazon De Cristo Cano, et al v. Joseph Biden, et al
as 22-56094
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CORAZON DE CRISTO CANO, TERRY HARDIN, CRYSTAL IRVIN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, President of the United States, SAFER FEDERAL WORKFORCE TASK FORCE, UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT and others
De Cristo Cano et al v. Biden et al
as 3:2022cv00193
Plaintiff:
Corazon De Cristo Cano, Terry Hardin, Crystal Irvin and others
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Safer Federal Workforce Task Force, United States Office of Personnel Management and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 bb Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03563
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Reed et al v. City of Des Moines
as 4:2019cv00366
Plaintiff:
Matthew Reed and Bela Animal Legal Defense and Rescue
Defendant:
City of Des Moines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haughwout v. Varone et al
as 3:2018cv01193
Defendant:
Vincent Demaio, Jeremiah Dunn, Bryan Pelligrini and others
Plaintiff:
Austin Haughwout
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2014cv03288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Conroy et al v. Caron et al
as 3:2014cv01180
Plaintiff:
Christine Conroy , Martin Conroy and Lauren Conroy
Defendant:
David A. Caron , Donald Bisi , Michael Furlong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BYRD et al v. REED et al
as 1:2014cv01072
Plaintiff:
DARLENE BYRD and JOHN A. BYRD
Defendant:
CITY OF CONNERSVILLE and M. MATTHEW REED
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Schofield et al v. Manchester et al
as 3:2012cv00544
Plaintiff:
Arthur W. Schofield and Nancy Matthews
Defendant:
Town of Manchester , South Windsor Police Dept , Michael Magrey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
