Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Simmons v. City of North Charleston Planning and Zoning Department
as 2:2021cv03334
Plaintiff:
Harold Simmons, Jr
Defendant:
City of North Charleston Planning and Zoning Department, R Keith Summey, Mary Cohen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McJunkin et al v. Girdner et al
as 6:2019cv00018
Defendant:
Adair County Board of County Commissioners, David Hardin, Jason Ritchie and others
Plaintiff:
Cami McJunkin and Molly McJunkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv05045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Labianco et al v. California, State of et al
as 3:2013cv00602
Plaintiff:
Richard A. Labianco and Keely Orlando
Defendant:
California, State of, P.H. Mills, N. Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv00514
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Rossman v. Darling
as 12-3717
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Brud Rossman
Defendant - Appellee:
David Darling, Chief of Police, Village of Catskill Police Department, Vincent Seeley, Trustee, Village of Catskill, New York, Thomas Spota, District Attorney, Suffolk County, New York and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv02094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Rossman v. Darling et al
as 1:2011cv01469
Plaintiff:
Brud Rossman
Defendant:
David Darling, Vincent Seeley, Thomas Spota and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rossman v. Spota et al
as 2:2011cv06105
Defendant:
John Doe-1, John Doe-2, John Doe-3 and others
Plaintiff:
Brud Rossman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
