Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv14101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Michael Grant v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 22-3200
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL GRANT
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, EMILE SAURIS and STEVEN MOFFITT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03547
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv04563
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
GRANT v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv00735
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, OFFICER JOHN DOE and OFFICERS ROE 1-10
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GRANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Grant v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 2:2018cv08927
Defendant:
City of Hawthorne, Does 1 through 100 and Starbucks Corporation
Plaintiff:
Michael Grant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Grant et al v. South Carolina Department of Social Services et al
as 2:2018cv01804
Defendant:
Sasserie Miles, Adrea Reynolds, South Carolina Department of Social Services and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Michael Grant, III and Tiana Elizabeth Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reyes v. Pendelton
as 18-779
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Angelo Reyes
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael Pendelton, Michael Mastropetre, Joseph Patolla and others
Defendant:
Hector Cortes
Ward et al v. The County of Mendocino et al
as 3:2017cv00911
Plaintiff:
Margaret Ward , Kevin Ward and Ina Ward
Defendant:
The County of Mendocino, Thomas D. Allman, Lorrie Knapp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reyes v. Pendelton et al
as 3:2016cv01783
Plaintiff:
Angelo Reyes
Defendant:
Michael Pendelton , Michael Mastropetre , Joseph Patolla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
