Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Hubbard v. Goldsboro Police Department et al
as 5:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Darrell Hubbard
Defendant:
Goldsboro Police Department, Alvino Daniels, Eric Goins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2173
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Smith v. Puszkiewicz et al
as 1:2019cv07750
Defendant:
Officer Puszkiewicz, Officer Lopez and City of Chicago
Plaintiff:
Marcus Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Jim Reece v. Diane Insley, et al
as 18-50296
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JIM REECE
Defendant - Appellee:
DIANE INSLEY, Individually and in official capacity as Director of San Marcos Public Library, JOHN DOE, No. 1, "Librarian", Individually and in official capacity, JANE DOE, No. 1, "Librarian", Individually and in official capacity and others
Reece v. Insley et al
as 1:2017cv00813
Defendant:
Marilyn Brister, Michael Cosentino, Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Jim Reece
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richard Elbert v. Gilbert Carter, et al
as 16-4077
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Richard M. Elbert
Defendant - Appellee:
Gilbert Carter, Police Officer, Francis Collins, Police Officer, Andrew Dorothy, Sgt. and others
Elbert v. Carter et al
as 4:2015cv00532
Plaintiff:
Richard M Elbert
Defendant:
Gilbert Carter , Francis Collins , Andrew Dorothy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Prindable et al
as 3:2013cv01174
Plaintiff:
Marcus Smith
Defendant:
Jason Prindable and Senela Konjeris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
