Cases 1 - 10 of 11
MACDONALD v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
KINLEY MACDONALD
Defendant:
DANIEL JOHNSON, BRUCE KILE, BOARD OF OVERSEERS OF THE BAR and others
Not Yet Classified:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Clervrain, Manetirony et al v. Farrow, Paul et al
as 3:2021cv00819
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Francis Cobbina Osei-Fosu
Defendant:
Paul Farrow, Gerard Randall, Jesse Garza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00853
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv06813
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00820
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mark Savoy v. St. Landry Parish Council, et al
as 12-31201
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK JAMES SAVOY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF EUNICE and JAMES GARY FONTENOT, individually & in his official capacity as Chief of Police of the City of Euncie
Giddings v. Byam
as 1:2011cv01246
Plaintiff:
Mark James Giddings
Defendant:
Allen L. Byam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Savoy v. St Landry Parish Council et al
as 6:2008cv00232
Plaintiff:
Mark James Savoy
Defendant:
St Landry Parish Council, Parish of St Landry, Sheriffs Dept St Landry Parish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Romine v. James
as 5:2008cv00080
Plaintiff:
Carroll Romine
Defendant:
Mark James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bender v. Kothe et al
as 4:2007cv00548
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Bender
Defendant:
Gary Kothe, Sarah Kothe, Troy, Missouri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
