Cases 1 - 10 of 622
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Harner-Brady v. McLane et al
as 1:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
Amanda Lynn Harner-Brady
Defendant:
Marsha McLane, Texas Civil Commitment Office, April Lambert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Marsha Mignott v. State Bar of Georgia Foundation, Inc., et al
as 24-10327
Plaintiff:
MARSHA W. MIGNOTT, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant:
STATE BAR OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION, INC., STATE BAR OF GEORGIA OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL and WILLIAM V. HEARNBURG, JR., In His Official Capacity
Stanley v. McDermott et al
as 4:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Marsha Stanley
Defendant:
Teresa McDermott and Planet Home Lending
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Aaron Bressi v. Northumberland County Court, et al
as 24-1130
Plaintiff:
AARON J. BRESSI
Defendant:
NORTHUMBERLAND COUNTY COURT, SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cora v. Wright et al
as 1:2024cv00263
Petitioner:
Ramon M. Cora, Sr.
Respondent:
Support Magistrate Marsha M. Wright and Human Resources
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
