Cases 1 - 10 of 89
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-6072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Prather v. State of Georgia
as 3:2024cv00018
Petitioner:
Johnny Isaiah Prather
Respondent:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv12930
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Prather v. East Baton Rouge Parish School Board et al
as 3:2023cv01349
Plaintiff:
Shawn Prather
Defendant:
East Baton Rouge Parish School Board and Richard Day
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
BOZELL v. MADDIX et al
as 1:2023cv01226
Plaintiff:
DAVID BOZELL
Defendant:
DRAKE MADDIX and DYLAN PRATHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Waste Services of the Bluegrass, LLC et al v. Georgetown, KY City of et al
as 5:2020cv00410
Defendant:
John Does 1-25, Joe Kane, Joe Pat Covington and others
Plaintiff:
Waste Services of the Bluegrass, LLC and Waste Services Realty, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jensen v. Thomas et al
as 3:2023cv01628
Plaintiff:
Tom Jensen
Defendant:
Timothy Thomas, Jannett Jackson, Atheria Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00787
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02060
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Kaho'okaulana et al v. U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. et al
as 1:2022cv00071
Plaintiff:
Deanna P. Kaho'okaulana, Phoebe K. Kaho'okaulana and Keona Kaho'okaulana
Defendant:
U.S. Bank Trust, N.A., Caliber Mortgage Co., Marshall Chinen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
