Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Canty et al v. Be Money Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv02470
Plaintiff:
Brittany Canty, Terrance Knox and Dillon Welch
Defendant:
Be Money Inc., D/B/A DAYLIGHT,, D/B/A PATHWARD FINANCIAL, INC.. Mete Bank, Robert Curtis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Hurley et al v. Curtis et al
as 1:2022cv12167
Plaintiff:
Kelly Hurley, Nicole Skeffington, Nicholas Catanese and others
Defendant:
Robert Curtis, Chris Bartolomei, Ronald Carpenter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv05596
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
American Patriot Express et al v. The City of Glens Falls, New York et al
as 1:2020cv00672
Plaintiff:
Dave Vanscoy, E.S., Florence Sherman and others
Defendant:
Daniel Hall, The City of Glens Falls, New York, Robert Curtis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. Bryant et al
as 9:2017cv00133
Plaintiff:
Robert Curtis Jackson
Defendant:
Rhea Bryant, Czarina Briones and in Home Attendant Services LTD.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilber v. Curtis, et al
as 16-2250
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT JUDE WILBER
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT CURTIS, BRIAN KINSELLA and MICHAEL ROGERS
Defendant:
MICHAEL SIMONEAU
Wilber v. Curtis et al
as 1:2015cv10170
Plaintiff:
Robert Jude Wilber
Defendant:
Robert Curtis , Brian Kinsella , Michael Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Finch v. Lang
as 6:2014cv00066
Plaintiff:
Robert Curtis Finch
Defendant:
Lee Lang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Robert Curtis v. State Of Oregon, et al
as 14-35023
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT CURTIS
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF OREGON and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
