Cases 1 - 10 of 926
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04646
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5531
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bailey v. Mask
as 3:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Billy Ray Bailey
Defendant:
Leo Mask, David Robertson, Ryan R Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00366
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Adams v. Robertson et al
as 4:2024cv05053
Plaintiff:
Ryan Scott Adams and Rooster
Defendant:
PhD Caitlin Robertson and Sarah Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TACCINO et al v. WREN et al
as 1:2024cv01571
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM A. TACCINO and CAROL J. TACCINO
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER WREN, MERRICK GARLAND, CHRISTIE CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Casanova v. Willow Bend Mortgage Company et al
as 3:2024cv00841
Plaintiff:
Neisy Casanova
Defendant:
Willow Bend Mortgage Company, Craig Schrank, National City Mortgage Co and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Estate of Lane Caviness, et al v. Atlas Air, Inc., et al
as 24-11033
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF LANE CAVINESS, PATRICK AKERLUND, MICHAEL ALZATI and others
Defendant:
ATLAS AIR, INC. and FLIGHT SERVICES INTERNATIONAL, LLC
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
Robertson v. Hydromax USA et al
as 2:2024cv00409
Plaintiff:
Fatuma Robertson
Defendant:
Hydromax USA and Tommy Chandler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Robertson v. Robertson et al
as 2:2024cv00312
Plaintiff:
Belinda Robertson
Defendant:
Cale Robertson, Julie Kestner, FNU Fitch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
