Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Juluke v. Davis et al
as 2:2023cv03111
Plaintiff:
Bernell Juluke
Defendant:
Len Davis, Samuel Williams, Wayne Tamborella and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller v. City of Jacksonville et al
as 3:2020cv00257
Defendant:
City of Jacksonville, Katy Harris, Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Miller, Samuel William Miller and Tatiana Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller et al v. Florida Department of Children and Families et al
as 3:2018cv00947
Plaintiff:
Tatiana Miller, A. M., S. M. and others
Defendant:
Yelena Weintraub, Linda G. Liechty, Alison Brooke Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv05000
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv04949
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Miller et al v. Osber et al
as 3:2016cv00398
Plaintiff:
Samuel William Miller and Tatiana Miller
Defendant:
Steven H. Osber , Donald H. Lester, Michael S Sharitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. City of Raleigh et al
as 5:2011cv00279
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Samuel Williams
Defendant:
City of Raleigh and Brian W Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cyber Zone E-Cafe, Inc. et al v. King et al
as 5:2010cv00149
Plaintiff:
Cyber Zone E-Cafe, Inc. and Jeffrey M. Reed
Defendant:
Brad King, Ed Dean and Samuel Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2007cv05144
Plaintiff:
Samuel Williams, Samuel Williams, Samuel Williams and others
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Ronald Newman, Tion Horton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Civil Rights
Gorecki v. City of Cambridge et al
as 2:2007cv00420
Plaintiff:
Dale A. Gorecki
Defendant:
City of Cambridge, John J. Jones, Richard Wayt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
