Cases 1 - 10 of 72
Eduardo Luna v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Luna
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, Kyle Deluca, Louis Trejo-Vides and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00193
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Frances Enyart et al v. County of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2023cv00540
Plaintiff:
Frances Enyart, Gregory Enyart, Amanda Kelley and others
Defendant:
County of San Beranrdino, Aaron Conley, Umphlett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00917
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
REITER et al v. NOEL et al
as 4:2022cv00127
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER REITER and TIFFANY NAPIER
Defendant:
JAMEY NOEL, DONOVAN HARRID, BRADLEY KRAMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Skaggs v. City of Taylorville et al
as 3:2022cv03178
Plaintiff:
Daniel Skaggs
Defendant:
City of Taylorville, Jeremy Alwerdt, Dwayne Wheeler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PS)DeVan Daniel v. Clayborne et al
as 2:2022cv01350
Plaintiff:
Melvin DeVan Daniel
Defendant:
Robert Clayborne, Jared Macias, Nathan Thalen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gray v. City of Radcliff, Kentucky et al
as 3:2022cv00170
Plaintiff:
Anthony Gray
Defendant:
City of Radcliff, Kentucky, Jeffrey Cross, W.E. Wells and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Guidry v. Grauman et al
as 2:2021cv01238
Plaintiff:
David Guidry
Defendant:
Daniel Grauman, Sean McPherson, Jeremiah Skaggs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00004
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
