Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Lietzke v. City of Montgomery et al
as 0:2023cv03332
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
City of Montgomery, Kevin Murphy and Steven Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lietzke v. City of Montgomery et al
as 0:2023cv03329
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
City of Montgomery, Chief Kevin Murphy, Steven Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lietzke v. City of Montgomery et al
as 0:2023cv03336
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
City of Montgomery, Kevin Murphy and Steven Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lietzke v. City of Montgomery et al
as 0:2023cv03328
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
City of Montgomery, Kevin Murphy and Steven Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lietzke v. City of Montgomery et al
as 0:2023cv03244
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
City of Montgomery, Montgomery Police Department, Steven Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Smith v. City of Montgomery, Alabama (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00021
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
City of Montgomery, Alabama, Steven Reed, Darryl Albert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. City of Montgomery, Alabama et al(MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00023
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
City of Montgomery, Alabama, Oronde K. Mitchell, Brantley Lyons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00607
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lietzke v. City of Montgomery et al
as 1:2021cv00195
Defendant:
City of Montgomery and Steven Reed
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
