Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Mitchell v. Ruff et al
as 4:2024cv03046
Plaintiff:
James T. Mitchell
Defendant:
Sergeant Devin Ruff, Deputy Roland Kramer and John or Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mitchell v. The State of New York
as 23-705
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Stephen T. Mitchell
Defendant / Appellee:
The State of New York and Leticia James, the Attorney General for the State of New York
Mitchell v. James et al
as 1:2022cv03791
Plaintiff:
Stephen T. Mitchell
Defendant:
Letitia James, Esq., State of New York, Eric Gonzalez, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mitchell v. Aimbridge Hospitality et al
as 4:2022cv01242
Plaintiff:
Stephen T Mitchell
Defendant:
Aimbridge Hospitality, Tru by Hilton Hotel, Unknown Employees or Agents of Aimbridge Hospitality and/ or Tru by Hilton Hotel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Mitchell v. The State of New York et al
as 1:2022cv01747
Plaintiff:
Stephen T. Mitchell
Defendant:
The State of New York and Letitia James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kasisomayajula v. Bailey et al
as 3:2021cv01745
Plaintiff:
Hema Kasisomayajula
Defendant:
Tara Bailey, Sherri Stevensen and Timothy T. Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MITCHELL v. TOWN OF WHITESTOWN et al
as 1:2021cv01935
Defendant:
OFFICER BLAYNE ROOT, TOWN OF WHITESTOWN, SGT. JOHN JURKASH and others
Plaintiff:
MR. TREY T MITCHELL and TREY T. MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FARMER v. HAMMOND POLICE et al
as 1:2021cv01636
Plaintiff:
JEREMIAH S. FARMER
Defendant:
CHRISTISON, ANTHONY ADAMS, DANIAL MITTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv04088
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
GLOVER v. BAXTER et al
as 5:2019cv00181
Defendant:
COREY E SILCOX, MICHAEL A MONEYHAM, MICHAEL J BAXTER and others
Plaintiff:
DARREN L GLOVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
