Cases 1 - 10 of 14
James Daniel Alexander v. Jerry Brown et al
as 8:2023cv00274
Plaintiff:
James Daniel Alexander
Defendant:
Jerry Brown, Kathleen Allison, Jeffrey A Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. California Employment Development Department et al
as 3:2021cv02145
Plaintiff:
Christopher T. Nelson
Defendant:
California Employment Developement Department and Rita Saenz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 va Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 14th Amendment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02504
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Shabazz v. Annucci et al
as 1:2019cv11819
Defendant:
Bailey, T. Nelson, David Uhler and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Aziz Zarif Shabazz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv12980
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Kenley v. Mohave, County of et al
as 3:2017cv08095
Plaintiff:
Margaret Kenley
Defendant:
Mohave, County of , Mohave County Sheriff's Office and T Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nazario et al v. Chedister et al
as 0:2012cv00066
Plaintiff:
Michael David Nazario , Sr., Yasiah Olivia Mahaliya Nazario, Michael David Nazario, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Karin Chedister, Dave Adney, Pete Dymit and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nelson v. Herrick et al
as 3:2011cv00014
Defendant:
Albemarle County Department of Social Services and Andrew H Herrick
Plaintiff:
John T. Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00351
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-1651
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
