Civil Rights Cases
Timothy Anstine v. Jerome Adams, et al
as 23-1406
Plaintiff / Appellant: TIMOTHY MARK ANSTINE
Defendant / Appellee: JEROME MICHAEL ADAMS, in his personal capacity, RODNEY R. AKERS, in his personal capacity, THERON R. PEREZ, in his personal capacity and others
Louis Holger Eklund, et al v. Sharon Gleason, et al
as 22-35446
Plaintiff / Appellant: LOUIS HOLGER EKLUND, AKA Louis Holger
Plaintiff: ALASKA NATIVE CHILDREN & FAMILIES
Defendant / Appellee: SHARON L. GLEASON, JONAS M. WALKER, BRYAN SCHRODER and others
Holger et al v. Gleason et al
as 2:2022cv00001
Plaintiff: Louis Holger and The Alaska Native Children & Families
Defendant: Sharon L. Gleason, Jonas M. Walker, Bryan Schroder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Anstine v. Adams et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv02160
Defendant: Matthew J. Updegrove, Jane Doe, Jerome Michael Adams and others
Plaintiff: Timothy Mark Anstine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Dorian Brooks v. City of Long Beach et al
as 8:2013cv00478
Defendant: Kalid Abuhadwan, City of Long Beach, Lee David Debrabander and others
Plaintiff: Dorian Brooks
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv01536
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Marks v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 1:2010cv12124
Petitioner: Timothy Marks
Respondent: Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01072
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
TABOR v. MCNESBY et al
as 3:2007cv00174
Plaintiff: TIMOTHY MARK TABOR and TIMOTHY MARK TABOR
Defendant: RON MCNESBY and JAMES E SULLIVAN, JR
Counter Claimant: RON MCNESBY
Counter Defendant: TIMOTHY MARK TABOR and TIMOTHY MARK TABOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?