Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Stanwyck v. City of Rhome et al
as 4:2024cv00346
Plaintiff:
Marc Stanwyck
Defendant:
City of Rhome, Eric Debus, Carvan Atkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Shields v. City of Houston
as 4:2024cv01291
Plaintiff:
Tye Shields
Defendant:
City of Houston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis, Nancy et al v. City of Beloit et al
as 3:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Nancy Davis, Tye M. Gustina, Kenneth J. Klass and others
Defendant:
City Of Beloit, Wisconsin, Nancy V. Forbeck, Yusuf Adama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Jared Bailey v. City of Olympia Prosecutor, et al
as 23-35411
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JARED J. BAILEY
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF OLYMPIA PROSECUTOR, AKA R. Tye Graham, AKA Rosemary Hewitson, THURSTON COUNTY JAIL, CITY OF OLYMPIA POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Bailey v. City of Olympia Prosecutor et al
as 3:2022cv05973
Plaintiff:
Jared J Bailey
Defendant:
City of Olympia Prosecutor, Thurston County Jail, City of Olympia Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tye Hilmo v. Erica Jackson, et al
as 22-13015
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYE HILMO
Defendant / Appellee:
ERICA JACKSON and COURTNEY VINSON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv06078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Baxter v. Stephens et al
as 3:2021cv00241
Plaintiff:
Tye Baxter
Defendant:
Shawn Stephens, Aaron Moody and Independence County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mallory v. Memphis Area Transit Authority et al
as 2:2021cv02409
Plaintiff:
Joshua Mallory
Defendant:
Tye and Memphis Area Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
