Cases 1 - 10 of 154
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 ra Job Discrimination (Race)
Henry et al v. Iron County et al
as 1:2024cv00218
Defendant:
Iron County, Chase Bresnahan, Verizon Communications Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Adrienne Henry and R. H.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Henry et al v. Iron County et al
as 4:2024cv01562
Defendant:
Chase Bresnahan, Iron County, Jeffrey Burkett and others
Plaintiff:
R. H. and Adrienne Henry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01290
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01417
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
SHIPMAN v. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
as 3:2024cv09212
Plaintiff:
DENNIS SHIPMAN
Defendant:
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parker, Jr. et al v. Verizon Communications Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv08436
Defendant:
Verizon Communications Inc. and Cellco Partnership doing business as Verizon Wireless
Plaintiff:
Thelton George Parker, Jr. and Steven Doyle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06156
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gillespie v. Google LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Neil J. Gillespie
Defendant:
Google LLC, Alphabet Inc., Verizon Communications, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
