Cases 1 - 10 of 249
MPC et al v. Racine County et al
as 2:2024cv00630
Plaintiff:
MPC and CMC
Defendant:
Racine County, Jalee Banach, Hope Otto and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00603
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Daniel v. United Nations (UN) et al
as 8:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Fitch Daniel, Daniel Lubango Kene and Daniel L. Otto
Defendant:
United Nations (UN), United Kingdom, Acholi Trust Territories and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Riethmeier v. Oakland, County of et al
as 2:2024cv10799
Plaintiff:
Rex Riethmeier
Defendant:
Oakland County, Jeremy Babiak, Zachary Jensen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Robert Otto, et al v. City of Boca Raton, Florida
as 24-10537
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. OTTO and JULIE H. HAMILTON
Defendant:
CITY OF BOCA RATON, FLORIDA
Robert Otto, et al v. City of Boca Raton, Florida, et al
as 24-10478
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. OTTO and JULIE H. HAMILTON
Defendant:
CITY OF BOCA RATON, FLORIDA and COUNTY OF PALM BEACH, FL
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
