Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-60161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
THOMPSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
BRUCE THOMPSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, ACCOUNTING SERVICE CENTER, AMAZON.COM INC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Sones de Mexico Ensemble et al
as 2:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Defendant:
Sones de Mexico Ensemble, The Chain Smokers, Stevie Wonder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
CULLEY v. FERGUSON et al
as 3:2023cv00004
Plaintiff:
JIMMIE LEE CULLEY, JR.
Defendant:
CHAD FERGUSON and DAVE WEDDING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Jimmie Culley, Jr. v. Rodney Miller, et al
as 22-3197
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JIMMIE LEE CULLEY, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
RODNEY MILLER, Deputy, LOGAN OSBORNE, Deputy, JAMES TRAPP, Deupty and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00709
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02925
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00749
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
