Cases 1 - 10 of 133
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
POSYTON, v. TOWN OF WESTFIELD
as 2:2024cv04611
Plaintiff:
RONALD H. POSYTON, III
Defendant:
TOWN OF WESTFIELD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
POSYTON v. TOWN OF WESTFIELD
as 2:2024cv04356
Plaintiff:
RONALD H. POSYTON, III
Defendant:
TOWN OF WESTFIELD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
POSYTON, III v. TOWN OF WESTFIELD & AGENTS
as 2:2023cv08689
Plaintiff:
RONALD H. POSYTON, III
Defendant:
TOWN OF WESTFIELD & AGENTS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
JONES v. WESTFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2023cv00964
Plaintiff:
RANDALL JONES and City of Westfield, Indiana
Defendant:
WESTFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT, DAKOTA FOOTE, KAEDEN GEBHART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
POSYTON, III v. TOWNSHIP OF WESTFIELD et al
as 2:2023cv02020
Plaintiff:
RONALD H. POSYTON, III
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF WESTFIELD, DIFRANCESCO BATEMAN COLEY YOSPIN KUNZMAN DAVIS LEHRER AND FLAUM, P.C., RICHARD J. GUSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
POSYTON, III v. TOWNSHIP OF WESTFIELD et al
as 2:2023cv01932
Plaintiff:
RONALD H. POSYTON, III
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF WESTFIELD, DIFRANCESCO BATEMAN COLEY YOSPIN KUNZMAN DAVIS LEHRER & GLAUM, P.C., GOV. DONALD T. DIFRANCESCO, ESQ. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
