Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv06843
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
LaMartina v. City of Mandeville, et al
as 2:2021cv01030
Defendant:
Gerald Sticker, Unidentified Parties, David Parnell and others
Plaintiff:
Elise LaMartina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LaMartina v. City of Mandeville, Louisiana et al
as 8:2021cv01027
Defendant:
Gerald Sticker, David Parnell, Blue Williams, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Elise LaMartina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Southshore Restore et al v. Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation et al
as 1:2020cv05264
Defendant:
Brett Bender, Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation and As-Yet Unknown Defendants
Plaintiff:
Southshore Restore, Heartland Greens, Botavi Wellness LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv06895
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv02274
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Price v. State of Kansas, et al
as 16-3277
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID MARTIN PRICE
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF KANSAS, KANSAS DIVISION OF CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES, SHAWNEE COUNTY, KANSAS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2009cv00029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
