Cases 91 - 100 of 404
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00126
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
DeJesus v. Secretary Department of Corrections
as 9:2020cv80190
Plaintiff:
Edwin DeJesus
Defendant:
Secretary Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(PC)Rodriguez v. Clemmons
as 2:2020cv00173
Plaintiff:
Jose DeJesus Rodriguez
Defendant:
Michelle Clemmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDREWS v. CHRISTIE et al
as 3:2019cv21277
Defendant:
ASST. ADMIN. AMY EMRICH, APN. INAISH JACKSON, INV. RODRIGUEZ and others
Plaintiff:
AMIR ANDREWS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cosby v. DeJesus
as 3:2019cv01898
Plaintiff:
Howard Cosby
Defendant:
DeJesus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THE ESTATE OF ISAAC DEJESUS et al v. CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv05584
Defendant:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC, ANDREA BRANNEN, MCKENZIE NASH and others
Plaintiff:
RAQUEL GARCIA and THE ESTATE OF ISAAC DEJESUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeJesus-Vazquez v. Bethencourt et al
as 1:2019cv10587
Defendant:
Ramon Bethencourt, Jr., Robert H. Middlemiss, Deborah Mills and others
Plaintiff:
Egberto DeJesus-Vazquez
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Ryan Neijer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeJesus v. Burkhalter et al
as 4:2019cv00241
Defendant:
Floyd County Lt. Kess Ploff, Floyd County Sheriff Tim Burkhalter, Floyd County Major Robert Sapp and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Manuel DeJesus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Wolinski v. Eldridge et al
as 2:2019cv02037
Defendant:
S. DeJesus, P. Linehan, K. Mim and others
Plaintiff:
Krzysztof Wolinski and Krzysztof F. Wolinski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pablo-Dejesus v. County of Multnomah
as 3:2019cv01574
Plaintiff:
Samuel Pablo-Dejesus and Sam Pablo-Dejesus
Defendant:
County of Multnomah and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
