Cases 91 - 100 of 476
Mayes v. Acree et al
as 5:2021cv00171
Defendant:
Judge Lindsay H. Thurston and Patrol A. Acree
Plaintiff:
Richie Elzander Mayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRUZ v. CATER et al
as 2:2021cv00236
Defendant:
MATLOCK, GRAYHOUSE, HAMLIN and others
Plaintiff:
JOHNATHAN S. CRUZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Means v. Woodget et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00399
Defendant:
Jeffery Baldwin, Patrice Richie Jones, Bullock Prison Health Services and others
Plaintiff:
Kendell Cottrell Means
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dortch v. Boynes et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00381
Plaintiff:
Harold L. Dortch
Defendant:
Geno Lysykanyez, Nurse Jackson, Patrice Richie Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00379
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Patrice Richie Jones, Steven T. Marshall and others
Plaintiff:
Clinton James Pearson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jacobs v. Jones et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00366
Defendant:
Brittany L. Marshall, Patrice Richie Jones, J. Robbins and others
Plaintiff:
Alvin Roy Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawson v. Ledbetter et al
as 3:2021cv00071
Plaintiff:
Richard Lawson
Defendant:
Carroll County Jail, Jack T. Bell Detention Center, Officer Ledbetter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickinson v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00281
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Patrice Richie Jones, Capt. McCorvey and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Michael Dickinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stone v. Jones et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00246
Defendant:
Captain Smiley, Captain Carter, LaCharla Kirksey and others
Plaintiff:
LaMichael LaCorey Stone and JaMichael LaCorey Stone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carroll v. Taylor et al
as 3:2021cv00034
Plaintiff:
Timothy Levi Carroll
Defendant:
Sargent Richie, Sargent Harrison and Captain Shane Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
