Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 3,028
Thomas v. Warden
as 6:2024cv00004
Petitioner: Albert Thomas, III
Respondent: USP McCreary Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Brown v. USP Big Sandy
as 7:2024cv00006
Plaintiff: Terrance Brown
Defendant: USP Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Bolton v. USP Coleman II
as 5:2023cv00691
Plaintiff: Kevin Bolton
Defendant: USP Coleman II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Wright v. USP McCreary
as 6:2023cv00221
Petitioner: Marcus D. Wright
Respondent: Warden of USP McCreary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Coplen v. USP McCreary We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2023cv00222
Petitioner: Antwan Elvago Coplen
Respondent: Warden of USP McCreary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Oriyomi Sadiq Aloba v. FCC Coleman - USP I Warden
as 23-13736
Petitioner / Appellant: ORIYOMI ALOBA and ORIYOMI SADDIQ ALOBA
Respondent / Appellee: FCC COLEMAN - USP I WARDEN
Davis v. USP Big Sandy We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00817
Plaintiff: Demaurea Davis and De'Maurea Davis
Defendant: USP Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01900
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Delgado v. Warden at USP Yazoo City MA
as 3:2023cv03106
Plaintiff: Juan Pablo Sanchez Delgado
Defendant: Warden at USP Yazoo City MA
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Young v. USP Big Sandy
as 7:2023cv00101
Petitioner: Tramell Deon Young
Respondent: USP Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?