Cases 101 - 110 of 25,864
Mabry v. Hopkins et al
as 3:2024cv00396
Plaintiff:
Jabar Mabry
Defendant:
CO Hopkins and Lt. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franks v. Jones
as 6:2024cv03232
Plaintiff:
Jason Ray Franks
Defendant:
Mark A Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Jones v. Charleston County et al
as 6:2024cv03237
Plaintiff:
Nekeya Jones
Defendant:
Charleston County, Charleston County Sheriff's Office, Wellpath LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Jones v. Gadsen County Sheriffs Department et al
as 1:2024cv22047
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Jones
Defendant:
Gadsen County Sheriffs Department and State of Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Stevens v. Jones
as 1:2024cv02360
Petitioner:
Yakenski Stevens
Respondent:
Joshua Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gormley (PS) v. Khanzada et al
as 1:2024cv01534
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Gormley and Kathleen Mary Gormley
Defendant:
Abdul Khanzada, Brittany Khanzada, Tony and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Jones et al
as 7:2024cv00340
Plaintiff:
Marcus Johnson
Defendant:
FNU Jones, FNU Firmburn, FNU Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Johnson v. Jones et al
as 5:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
Marcus Johnson
Defendant:
C Jones, D. Luke, FNU Perkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
JONES v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
SCOTT RYAN JONES
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRISON v. MCLEAN et al
as 1:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
YAW NYADU HARRISON
Defendant:
ZERRANTI MCLEAN, JOHN DOE, MR. NEU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
