Cases 101 - 110 of 2,683
Banks v. FBI, et al
as 17-1184
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY, ROBERT WERNER and others
Sarokim et al v. Six Unknown Agents et al
as 6:2017cv00291
Plaintiff:
Jeugini Sarokim and Young Yil Jo
Defendant:
Six Unknown Agents, Barack Obama and Donald Trump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-35140
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gamez Padilla v. Upton
as 4:2017cv00121
Petitioner:
Dulce Olivia Gamez Padilla
Respondent:
Jody R. Upton, Department of Justice and President Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Flournoy v. Upton et al
as 4:2017xc00115
Petitioner:
Dawn Deshonna Flournoy
Respondent:
Jody Upton, Department of Justice and President Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
NORRIS v. WARDEN et al
as 2:2017cv00036
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, S. JULIAN, BARACK OBAMA and others
Petitioner:
JOHN NORRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CALLEN v. WARDEN et al
as 2:2017cv00037
Petitioner:
JOHN CALLEN, JR.
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, S. JULIAN, BARACK OBAMA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Suh v. Unknown Parties et al
as 4:2017cv00038
Plaintiff:
Andrew Suh
Defendant:
Unknown Parties, Barack Obama and Donald Trump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. Upton et al
as 4:2017cv00074
Petitioner:
Shanda Renee Hawkins
Respondent:
Jody Upton, Department of Justice and President Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rhonda Fleming v. Jody Upton, et al
as 17-10055
Petitioner - Appellant:
RHONDA FLEMING
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN JODY UPTON, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
