Cases 101 - 110 of 3,907
Moore v. Murphy et al
as 3:2023cv01638
Plaintiff:
Samuel Moore
Defendant:
Jerall Murphy, Jackson, Jesus Guadarrama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GIST v. MCGANN et al
as 1:2023cv23217
Plaintiff:
DARRELL F. GIST
Defendant:
STEPHANIE MCGANN, ABIGAIL LOPEZ, MR. MURPHY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. MURPHY et al
as 1:2023cv23183
Plaintiff:
KEVIN JACKSON
Defendant:
PHIL MURPHY, VICTORIA KUHN, ALISHA LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. State of Mississippi
as 1:2023cv00363
Plaintiff:
Matthew Thomas Murphy
Defendant:
John Doe and State of Mississippi
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murphy v. United States
as 4:2023cv02061
Plaintiff:
James E. Murphy
Defendant:
Ms. White, N.C. English, Ian Conners and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Murphy v. I.R.S.
as 4:2023cv04654
Plaintiff:
Gregory Earl Murphy, Sr. and Sh
Defendant:
I.R.S.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Cueto et al
as 5:2023cv01501
Petitioner:
David Preston Murphy
Respondent:
Edmundo Cueto and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Sanders et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00699
Plaintiff:
Elijah Deshawn Robinson
Defendant:
Demarcus Sanders, A. Murphy, Jamal D. Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shakouri v. Becker et al
as 1:2023cv01479
Plaintiff:
Shahram Shakouri
Defendant:
Scott Becker, John Rolater, Jennifer Edgeworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: Murphy
as 3:2023cv01994
Plaintiff:
David Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
