Cases 101 - 110 of 1,742
Dante' Stone v. John Minton, Jr., et al
as 23-5727
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANTE' CORVETTE STONE
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN D. MINTON, JR., UNKNOWN KENTUCKY SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, ERIN HOFFMAN-YANG and others
US v. Terrance Brown, Jr.
as 23-6789
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TERRANCE NATHANIEL BROWN, JR., a/k/a War, a/k/a War Stone, a/k/a Luciano
Jamey Wilkins v. Keith Stone
as 23-6781
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMEY LAMONT WILKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
KEITH STONE, MISTE STRICKLAND, CAPTAIN BRAD JENKINS and others
Owens #829102 v. Briske et al
as 1:2023cv00784
Plaintiff:
D'Angelo Jarmal Owens #829102
Defendant:
Addie Briske, Candi Mason, Jack Bellinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickens v. City of Tacoma et al
as 3:2023cv05651
Plaintiff:
Marlin Giovanni Pickens
Defendant:
City of Tacoma, Ricardo S Martinez, Virginia Mason Franciscan Health and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Nealson v. Reynolds et al
as 7:2023cv00442
Plaintiff:
Christian Thomas Nealson
Defendant:
Reynolds, S.K. Coleman, Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nealson v. Stone et al
as 7:2023cv00444
Plaintiff:
Christian Thomas Nealson
Defendant:
Sgt. Stone, C/O Stacey, C/O Keene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Stone v. Pfieffer
as 1:2023cv01042
Petitioner:
Adam Jay Stone
Respondent:
Pfieffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Puller v. Unknown
as 3:2023cv00442
Plaintiff:
Toccara Y. Puller
Defendant:
Fluvanna Correctional Center, Unknown, Officer Wells and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plunkett v. Ward et al
as 5:2023cv00065
Plaintiff:
Stephen Christopher Plunkett
Defendant:
TIMOTHY C WARD, Damon Henninger, William Danforth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
