Cases 111 - 120 of 666
Tripp v. Cook et al
as 4:2020cv04021
Defendant:
Jennifer Driski, Kyle Bender, Eugiene Regier and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Christopher Micheal Tripp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv01073
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv00827
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Neufville v. Coyne-Fague, et al
as 1:2020cv00005
Defendant:
Walter Duffy, Jeffery Aceto, Lieutenant Bruce Oden and others
Plaintiff:
Eric G. Neufville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tripp v. U.S. Federal Government et al
as 4:2019cv04199
Plaintiff:
Kevin Tripp and Kevin Christopher Micheal Tripp
Defendant:
Matthew Thelen, Jason Ravnsborg, U.S. Federal Government and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Martin v. Early et al
as 4:2019cv03568
Defendant:
Ms. Beeks, Curtis Early, Susan Duffy and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Fred Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Logan-Bey v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2020cv00407
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, Hennepin County Attorney's Office, Hennepin County District Court and others
Plaintiff:
William Earl Logan-Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duffy v. Vereen
as 3:2020cv00057
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Charles Duffy
Defendant:
Warden Walter Vereen
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
King et al v. U.S. Marshal Service et al
as 3:2019cv01337
Defendant:
Haley Duffy, U.S. Marshal Service, Sheriff and others
Plaintiff:
Darren Jammal King, Jamal Christopher and Denzael Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prince v. Maguire et al
as 0:2020cv60010
Defendant:
Deputy Bradshaw, Brenda D. Forman, Officer Douglas E Szczepanik and others
Plaintiff:
Deshawn A. Prince
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
