Cases 111 - 120 of 1,186,082
Palmer v. Lumpkin
as 24-20215
Petitioner:
Scott Edward Palmer
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Nicholas Ely v. Rob Jeffreys, et al
as 24-2036
Petitioner:
Nicholas Ely
Respondent:
Rob Jeffreys, the Director of the Nebraska Department of Correctional Services and Todd Wasmer, Warden Tecumseh Correctional Institution
Randy Rindahl v. Tim Reisch, et al
as 24-2033
Plaintiff:
Randy Rindahl
Defendant:
Kimberley Malsam-Rysdon, Ex-Secretary of Health, Joan Adam, Interim Secretary of Health, Kristi Noem, Governor for the State of South Dakota and others
Rodriguez v. Lumpkin
as 24-50392
Petitioner:
Jesus Rodriguez
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Anthony Harris v. County of Cook, et al
as 24-1878
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY HARRIS
Defendant:
COUNTY OF COOK, THOMAS J. DART, LIEUTENANT DELITZ and others
John Koehler v. Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-9000
Plaintiff:
JOHN JOSEPH KOEHLER
Defendant:
SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI and SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI
Ashley Georges v. Helen Godby, et al
as 24-1884
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY GEORGES
Defendant:
HELEN C. GODBY and YVONNE SMITH SEGARS
Dayton #355356 v. Thornell et al
as 4:2024cv00257
Petitioner:
Robert Guy Dayton, Jr.
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell, Staci Ibarra and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Waide #067117 v. Unknown Party et al
as 2:2024cv01153
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lee Waide, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown Party, NaphCare and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Harrison v. Birtwell et al
as 2:2024cv01413
Plaintiff:
Michael David Harrison
Defendant:
Birtwell, Moore, Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
