Cases 121 - 130 of 142
Albert Randolph v. Loretta Kelly
as 10-7654
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALBERT RANDOLPH
Defendant - Appellee:
LORETTA KELLY, Warden-Chief, KEITH DAWKINS, Unit Manager Housing Unit 4, R. WALLACE, Treatment Program Supervisor and others
Albert Randolph v. Loretta Kelly
as 10-7447
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALBERT RANDOLPH
Defendant - Appellee:
LORETTA KELLY, Warden-Chief, KEITH DAWKINS, Unit Manager Housing Unit 4, R. WALLACE, Treatment Program Supervisor and others
Derrick Brown v. Matt Rodarmel, et al
as 10-3758
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK LAKEITH BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
MATT RODARMEL, Case Manager, TYRONE WALLACE, Federal Informant, E STEWART, Lieutenant and others
Knight v. Johnson et al
as 3:2010cv00648
Petitioner:
Wilmer Jerome Knight
Respondent:
Loretta K. Kelly, J. Woodson, Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown v. Hepner et al
as 3:2010cv01785
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lakeith Brown
Defendant:
J. Hepner, M Edinger, Ivan Navarro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hudson v. Thaler
as 3:2010cv00325
Petitioner:
Charles D Hudson
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hudson v. Thaler
as 4:2010cv02940
Petitioner:
Charles D Hudson
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Alfred Lee v. D. Hudson, et al
as 10-13415
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALFRED WAYNE LEE
Defendant - Appellee:
D. HUDSON, OTHER UNNAMED FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Miller v. Texas et al
as 5:2009cv00129
Petitioner:
Lee Nichols McNab Miller
Respondent:
State of Texas, T D C Prisons, Janie Cockrell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hudson v. State of Kansas, et al
as 09-3157
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHELIA D. HUDSON
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF KANSAS, JEFF SMITH, Corrections Manager I, Sentence Computation Unit, SHELLY STARR, Staff Attorney, Kansas Department of Corrections and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
