Cases 11 - 20 of 276
IN RE: MONIQUE D. DOTSON
as 5:2023cv03995
Plaintiff:
MONIQUE D. DOTSON
Defendant:
JILL GALAPIO, NORMA IRIZZARTE, KAREN SCHULER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hampton v. Jefferys et al
as 3:2023cv03238
Plaintiff:
Deon Hampton
Defendant:
Rob Jefferys, Latoya Hughes, . Case and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGinnis #139325 v. Washington et al
as 2:2023cv00134
Plaintiff:
Leslie McGinnis #139325
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Unknown O'Brien, Unknown Party #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGinnis v. Washington et al
as 2:2023cv11610
Plaintiff:
Leslie McGinnis
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, O'Brien, John Doe and others
MCGINNIS v. CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00922
Plaintiff:
JAMES S. MCGINNIS
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA LLC, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and TRICIA PRETORIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neil McGinnis v. James Slayer, et al
as 23-2270
Petitioner / Appellant:
Neil McGinnis
Respondent / Appellee:
Warden James Slayer, North Dakota Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Colby Braun and others
Angela Richardson v. Dennis McGinnis
as 23-2142
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Angela Schuncey Richardson
Defendant / Appellee:
Dennis McGinnis, Sgt., McPherson Unit, ADC
Webster v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv10704
Plaintiff:
Mark Webster
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, MRF, FNU Montgomery and others
McGinnis v. FBOP, et al
as 4:2023cv00423
Petitioner:
Scott M. McGinnis
Respondent:
FBOP, FCI Elkton and Warden F. Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jess Smith v. Ellis, et al
as 23-35085
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JESS RICHARD SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
ELLIS, Sgt., C.U.S. JONES, THOMAS L'HEUREUX and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
