Cases 11 - 20 of 4,823
Scroggs v. Compton et al
as 5:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Seth Reed Scroggs
Defendant:
J. Compton, R.A. Crow and Mooresville Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Reed
as 24-30329
Plaintiff:
Troy Davis
Defendant:
P. Reed, Captain, Joseph Westbrook, Master Sergeant, Unknown Scott, Sergeant and others
Grady v. Cathey et al
as 3:2024cv00506
Plaintiff:
Tracey Terrell Grady
Defendant:
Eddie Cathey, FNU Dennis, FNU Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crenshaw v. Leyton et al
as 2:2024cv11372
Plaintiff:
DeMario Reed Crenshaw
Defendant:
David Leyton, Karen Hansen and Chris Swanson
Soard v. Budnik et al
as 2:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Thomas Soard
Defendant:
Christopher Budnik, Tasha Griffin, McFadden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. LeBlanc
as 24-30326
Plaintiff:
Ellis Reed
Defendant:
James M. LeBlanc, Secretary, Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Randy Lavespere, Medical Doctor, Medical Director, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Elizabeth Britton, Hep-C, Case Manager, Louisiana State Penitentiary and others
Reco Reed v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc.
as 24-1899
Plaintiff:
RECO REED
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC.
Reed v. Lauderdale County
as 3:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Dekoyius L. Reed, Sr
Defendant:
Lauderdale County
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Authement v. Card et al
as 6:2024cv06068
Plaintiff:
Jerry Peter Authement
Defendant:
Cpl Mark Card, Samae Tucker, Sgt Dale Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Reed v. Christopher Swanson, et al
as 24-1434
Plaintiff:
DAVID ALLAN REED
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER R. SWANSON, Genesee County Sheriff and BRIAN D. MACMILLAN, Sr. Asst. Pros Atty/FOIA Coordinator
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
