Cases 11 - 20 of 125
Henry Gofan, Jr. v. Darlene Pereksta, et al
as 22-3313
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HENRY SAYE GOFAN, JR.
Defendant:
DARLENE J. PEREKSTA, THOMAS M. BROWN, EDWARD BELMOUNT and others
Defendant / Appellee:
STEVEN ELMER, KEVIN B. STARKEY, JOHN A. TONELLI and others
Goudlock v. Fuller et al
as 3:2022cv02199
Plaintiff:
Jason Goudlock
Defendant:
Lt. Fuller, Mullinex, Juan Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cowell v. Gray
as 5:2022cv02084
Petitioner:
Joshua R. Cowell
Respondent:
Warden David W. Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cullen v. Hallman et al
as 6:2022cv06115
Plaintiff:
John Patrick Cullen
Defendant:
Kip Hallman, Jorge Dominicis, Billy Cowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cowell v. Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
as 2:2022cv04002
Petitioner:
Joshua R Cowell
Respondent:
Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cox v. Payne et al
as 3:2022cv00275
Plaintiff:
Don Michael Cox
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Moses Jackson, III, John Moss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benton v. Payne et al
as 3:2022cv00277
Plaintiff:
Benny Benton
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Moses Jackson, III, John Moss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Payne et al
as 3:2022cv00276
Plaintiff:
Shane Price
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Moses Jackson, III, John Moss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Burgess et al
as 2:2022cv00901
Plaintiff:
Stephen Hall
Defendant:
Lt Burgess, CO Holzhueter, CO Cowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shenoskey v. Seger et al
as 1:2022cv00103
Plaintiff:
Richard Shenoskey
Defendant:
Dan Seger, Christina Craft and Jason Cowell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
