Cases 11 - 20 of 15,636
Ruggiero v. Rogers et al
as 9:2024cv00769
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ruggiero
Defendant:
Donald D. Rogers, Mark E. Carrow, Joseph H. Noeth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barfield v. Dixon et al
as 3:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Barfield
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, S. Pate, T.R. Mudd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LUCHIE v. HANCOCK
as 1:2024cv00087
Petitioner:
TYRONE LUCHIE
Respondent:
SHERIFF H W HANCOCK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LUCHIE v. HANCOCK et al
as 1:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
TYRONE LUCHIE
Defendant:
SHERIFF H W HANCOCK, FREDDIE HAUGABROOK, DEPUTY DREYFUSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Levesque v. Storie et al
as 4:2024cv40083
Plaintiff:
Andre Rene Levesque
Defendant:
Gregory P Storie, Letitia James, Julia Kaplan Toce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reddick v. County of Onondaga et al
as 9:2024cv00762
Plaintiff:
William H. Reddick, II
Defendant:
County of Onondaga, Onondaga County Justice Center, Sheriff Tobias Shelley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Lineberry et al
as 3:2024cv00715
Plaintiff:
Daniel H. Jones
Defendant:
Amber Lineberry and Board of Parole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03509
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Gallegos v. Gunter et al
as 2:2024cv01674
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Robert Gallegos
Defendant:
Nikki Gunter, CDCR and H. Moseley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Abbott et al
as 5:2024cv00665
Plaintiff:
Destry Earl Thomas
Defendant:
Governor Greg Abbott, Mag. Judge John W. Primomo, Judge H. F. Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
