Cases 11 - 20 of 2,409
Hicks v. Zimmerman et al
as 1:2024cv04086
Plaintiff:
Darnell Hicks
Defendant:
Captain Zimmerman, Ossining NY OVAC, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. Hicks
as 3:2024cv00344
Petitioner:
Waytayha Scott
Respondent:
Tikki M. Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gates v. Cherri et al
as 2:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
William A. Gates, Jr.
Defendant:
Sargeant Cherri, Sargeant Ceazar, Sargeant L. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv03701
Plaintiff:
Yarnell Hicks
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart and CCDOC Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Rollen v. Hicks
as 2:2024cv01303
Plaintiff:
Van Keyshone Rollen
Defendant:
A. Hicks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Wright v. Granville County
as 24-1389
Plaintiff:
JOHN H. WRIGHT, Administrator of the Estate of Chad E. Price
Defendant:
GRANVILLE COUNTY, SHERIFF BRINDELL B. WILKINS, JR., CHARLES ROYSTER NOBLIN, JR. and others
Alston v. Stuckey et al
as 0:2024cv02637
Plaintiff:
Londell Alston and Londell Lashun Alston
Defendant:
Kitchen overseer Mrs. Vanadore, William Stuckey, Domernic Caldwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Antonio Jones v. NJ Doc Central Transportation, et al
as 24-1758
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO JONES
Defendant:
NJ DOC CENTRAL TRANSPORTATION, DR. IHUOMA NWACHUKWU, M.D., DR. JAMES K. LIU, Rutgers Neurosurgeon and others
Smith v. Galipeau et al
as 2:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Jerry Smith and Jerry A Smith
Defendant:
Kenneth J Falk, John Galipeau, Kenneth Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Jerry Smith and Jerry A Smith
Defendant:
Kenneth J Falk, John Galipeau, Kenneth Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
