Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Bailey v. Davis (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00847
Plaintiff:
Daniel Leo Bailey, Sr.
Defendant:
Ann Davis and Chilton County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Chilton County Jail et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00777
Plaintiff:
Tabeus Dewayne Robinson
Defendant:
Chilton County Jail, Ann Davis, Trae Barfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. Davis et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00759
Plaintiff:
Christopher Norris Simmons
Defendant:
Ann Davis, Kathy Garris and Chilton County Jail Admin.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thu v. Yahanda et al
as 1:2019cv00378
Plaintiff:
Aung Thu
Defendant:
Anne Davies, Robert T Burkhardt and Alan M Yahanda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THU v. YAHANDA et al
as 1:2019cv03591
Plaintiff:
AUNG THU
Defendant:
ANNE DAVIES, ROBERT T. BURKHARDT and ALAN M. YAHANDA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stow v. Davis et al
as 1:2018cv00768
Defendant:
George Corriveau and Anne Davis
Plaintiff:
Weston J. Stow
Undetermined:
NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only) and NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. United States of America
as 6:2018cv02019
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Lisa Ann Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
THU v. YAHANDA et al
as 2:2018cv00025
Defendant:
ROBERT T. BURKHARDT, ANNE DAVIES and ALAN M. YAHANDA
Plaintiff:
AUNG THU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THU v. YAHANDA et al
as 1:2017cv00612
Defendant:
ROBERT T. BURKHARDT, ANNE DAVIES and ALAN M. YAHANDA
Plaintiff:
AUNG THU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sterling v. Wexford Health Source Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv06280
Plaintiff:
Doris Sterling
Defendant:
Wexford Health Source Inc., Saleh Obaisi and Ann Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
